Cooperative Extension Service
The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences
PDF
L. Mark Risse, Associate Professor, and Thomas M. Bass, Educational Program Specialist
Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Casey W. Ritz, Assistant Professor, Poultry Science
Introduction
Table 1. Animal unit equivalents for different species
Swine Feeding Operation Permit Requirements
Table 2a. Summary of the swine regulations for existing operations
Table 2b. Summary of the swine regulations for new and expanding operations
Non-Swine Feeding Operations - Liquid Manure Systems
Non-Swine Feeding Operations - Dry Poultry Differences
Table 3. Summary of non-swine regulations
Table 4. Summary of non-swine regulations specific to dry litter poultry operations
Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plans
Certified Operators
Summary
Resources
The past several years have seen many changes in the way animal feeding operations are
regulated in Georgia. These changes
are largely driven by an increasing focus on agriculture as a
source of non-point source pollution. Since the U.S. Clean Water Act was passed in early 1970,
tremendous resources have been put into cleaning up point source pollution from municipalities
and industries through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). Large
confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are regulated under the NPDES program. Because
the program has been successful in reducing much of the nation’s point source pollution,
attention has now turned to non-point sources such as urban stormwater runoff, construction
related erosion and agricultural runoff.
As part of the focus on agricultural sources of pollution, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) have developed a Unified National Strategy for Animal Feeding Operations. An Animal Feeding Operation (AFO) is defined as an operation that confines animals for feeding for 45 days or more during a year in an area that does not support vegetation. At this time pastures are not considered part of an AFO. The unified strategy focuses on using Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plans (CNMPs) to reduce the risk of excess nitrogen and phosphorus entering our surface and ground waters.
The national focus on animal feeding operations (AFOs) increased pressure for Georgia to develop regulations for these operations. In Georgia, the NPDES program is administered by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division (EPD); by law, the state regulations must be at least as stringent as the federal regulations.
In 1999, the Georgia Department of Natural Resources proposed new regulations for the swine industry. These rules were finalized in April of 2000. In December of 2000, new rules and regulations were proposed for non-swine animal feeding operations. These regulations were approved in January of 2001 and only applied to operations with liquid manure handling systems. In fall, 2003, dry litter poultry operations were added to the rule. Both the swine and non-swine regulations are amendments to Georgia’s Rules for Water Quality Control, Chapter 391-3-6.
The approach to regulating AFOs is designed to tar-get the largest operations on the assumption that larger operations pose a greater pollution “risk.” Consequently, operations are regulated according to the number of “animal units.” An animal unit (A.U.) is the method that EPA originally used to standardize the regulations across animal species. Different regulations apply for AFOs with 300 A.U. or fewer, 301-1,000 A.U., 1,001-3,000 A.U. and more than 3,000 A.U. Table 1 gives the number of animals of different species in these categories.
Animal Type |
300 A.U. |
1000 A.U. |
3000 A.U. |
Beef cattle |
300 |
1000 |
3000 |
Dairy cattle (milked or dry) |
200 |
700 |
2100 |
Heifers |
300 |
1000 |
3000 |
Swine (>55 lbs) |
750 |
2500 |
7500 |
Swine (<55 lbs) |
N/A |
10000 |
30000 |
Poultry (dry) |
37500 |
125000 |
375000 |
Laying Hens (non-liquid) |
25000 |
82000 |
246000 |
Laying Hens (liquid) |
9000 |
30000 |
90000 |
Horses |
150 |
500 |
1500 |
For other species or unique production, consult the full regulation. |
|||
Although small operations (<300 A.U.) are not subject to these state regulations, they are subject to the Clean Water Act. They are not allowed to have discharge to surface waters and should use nutrient management planning. Remember, there is evidence of pollution, even a small operation can be designated by EPD for permitting, and would be subject to the Georgia animal waste regulations.
Several items are common to the swine and non-swine regulations. Both regulations focus on the operations developing and following a CNMP and having a Certified Operator. Smaller operations (301 to 1,000 A.U.) with liquid manure handling systems must apply for a state Land Application System Permit (LAS), and all larger operations (1,000+ A.U., liquid and dry) must obtain the more detailed NPDES permit. Both these permits must be obtained from EPD. Some significant dry litter poultry exceptions are discussed on page 3. A brief summary of the regulations follows. A complete copy isare on the AWARE website: http://www.agp2.org, then click on “Animal Waste Management.”
A brief summary of the regulations follows.
Some of the important regulations that an existing swine producer needs to be aware of are listed
below. The deadlines for these requirements have all passed.
Operations with 750 to 2,500 head that are more than 55 lbs:
Registration forms and NPDES permit forms are available from EPD. The NPDES forms are also available online from USEPA – http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/.
Requirements for existing swine operations with more than 2,500 head that are 55 lbs or more include all of the requirements above and an individual or general NPDES permit. This permit was required by October 31, 2000. If you are in this category and did not apply for the NPDES permit, you should do so immediately. These operations will have to develop a groundwater monitoring plan for lagoons. EPD will decide whether to issue the individual or general permit.
Requirements for new operations are more stringent than existing operations. The swine regulations are summarized in Tables 2a and 2b.
The non-swine regulations are similar to the swine regulations. The deadlines for these requirements have all passed. Important requirements for existing operations are listed below:
Operations with 301-1,000 A.U:
Operations greater than 1,000 A.U. must meet the requirements above and:
Again, requirements for new operations are more stringent. In addition to the above requirement, new operations:
There are some major differences in the way the non-swine regulations apply to poultry operations with dry manure or litter based systems. Due to the large number of farms, the industry has implemented its own regulations on small farms. Requirements for small farms vary from integrator to integrator.
Operations with less than 1,000 A.U.
CAFOs, farms greater than 1,000 A.U., follow these EPD regulations:
The non-swine regulations are summarized in Table 3.
CNMPs are the keystone of all these regulations. It is a strategy to make wise use of the nutrients on the farm while protecting water quality. It should be noted that the term CNMP has its origins with a specific product produced by NRCS. In Georgia, a permit NMP that contains the following information is required:

NMPs must be developed by Certified Planners, with the exception of those for dry litter poultry NMPs, which only require the assistance of a trained individual. The Georgia Department of Agriculture certifies planners and maintains a current list. The certified planners in-clude NRCS personnel, county agents, certified crop advisors, and other professionals who have attended the NMP training and demonstrated they can develop an acceptable plan. For NRCS cost share, a full CNMP developed by that agency is required.
In addition to the CNMPs, operations greater than 300 A.U., except dry litter poultry, must have Certified Operators. A Certified Operator must attend training and pass an exam. They must also obtain continuing education. The Georgia Department of Agriculture oversees these processes, although they may be conducted by other organizations. Dry litter poultry operators must attend a training promoted by Poultry Extension, but due to the simplicity of dry litter management, they do not require certification, regardless of their size.
The new regulations require changes in the way AFOs do business. The focus on management of nutrients can improve profitability by better use of nutrients produced on the farms and reduced need for fertilizer purchase. There may also be opportunities for composting and/or selling manures for off-farm uses. Although the new regulations require more record keeping, the records may help improve farm management and productivity. While these regulations may appear complex, they are designed to protect both the farmer and the environment. Compliance with these regulations will provide the farmer with documentation that they are making a conscientious reasonable effort to operate their farm in a safe and environmentally sound manner.
This document is intended to be an accurate outline of Georgia’s Animal Waste Regulations at the time of publication, and is not a comprehensive citation. It is recommended that the complete regulations be consulted before making any decisions regarding the current management, future expansion or new construction of an agricultural operation.
Depending on the size of your operation, CNMPs can be complex. There are resources to help you develop your plan. You can obtain assistance from your county extension agent, Soil and Water District, NRCS personnel, and private consultants. There are also various extension publications and web sites that can help. These are listed below.
Publications
Cunningham, D.L., and C.W. Ritz. 2003. Nutrient Management Programs for Georgia Poultry Growers. The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin #1226.
Gaskin, J. W., and G. H. Harris. 1999. Nutrient Management. Georgia Farm*A*Syst System. Co-operative Extension Bulletin 1152-16. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Gaskin, J. W., T.M. Bass, and V. Jones. 2004. Maps for Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plans. Cooperative Extension Bulletin 1195. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Gould , M. C., L. Guthrie, and W.I. Segars. 1996. Developing a Nutrient Management Plan for the Dairy Farm. Cooperative Extension Circular 819-16. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Nutrient Management Task Force. 1999. Nutrient Management for Georgia Agriculture. Cooperative Extension Bulletin 1185. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Plank, C.O. 2000. Soil Testing. Leaflet 99, Cooperative Extension Service. University of Georgia, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences.
Risse, L. M., and T. M. Bass (editors). 2004. Nutrient Management Specialist Course Manual. Dept of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Ritz, C.W., and W.C. Merka, 2004. Maximizing Poultry Manure Utilization Through Nutrient Management Planning. The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin #1245.
Web Resources
Many of the publications and tools described in this bulletin are available on the following web sites:
Bass, T. M., et. al. AWARE Home Page. http://www.agp2.org; click on “Animal Waste Management.” UGA Cooperative Extension Service and P2AD, GA-DNR.
Cunningham, D.L., et. al. Poultry Extension Home Page. http://department.caes.uga.edu/ poultry/extension/exthome.htm, UGA Cooperative Extension Service
U.S. EPA. Animal Feeding Operation Home Page. http://www.epa.gov/npdes/afovirtualcenter. U.S. EPA, Washington DC.
Regulatory Contacts
Georgia Department of Agriculture, Livestock and Poultry Field Forces: (404) 656-3665
Environmental Protection Division, Water Permitting Compliance and Enforcement: (404) 362-2680
Julia W. Gaskin, Land Application Specialist, UGA Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department.
Dr. John Worley, Extension Engineer, UGA Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department.
Dr. Dan Cunningham, Extension Poultry Scientist, UGA Poultry Science Department
![]()
Bulletin 1257/February, 2005
The University of Georgia and Ft. Valley State University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and counties of the state cooperating. The Cooperative Extension Service, the University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences offers educational programs, assistance and materials to all people without regard to race, color, national origin, age, gender or disability.
An Equal Opportunity Employer/Affirmative Action OrganizationCommitted to a Diverse Work Force
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating.
Josef M. Broder, Interim Dean and Director